As New York City students close out their first month of school, we’re stepping back to map where K–12 AI policy stands across the country. This week, we catalogue how states are regulating artificial intelligence in classrooms, how these guardrails impact teachers and students on the ground, and how some districts are building creative partnerships to expand access and opportunity.
Let’s dive in.
Jared Giles
Founder, SquareOne
[email protected]
The Nationwide Rise of K-12 AI Policy
Over forty states and Puerto Rico have officially issued statewide K-12 AI guidance as of September 2026. What began as a chaotic mix of pilots has evolved into an active wave of legislation, policies, and district guidance. But ten states, including major players like Texas, New York, and Pennsylvania, still have not issued guidance, leaving local education leaders to fend for themselves.
We can see the local impact of their delay: while 28 of the country's 50 largest school districts have published their own AI guidance, 14 still have nothing (8 are in process). In Texas, for example, the lack of a statewide framework has led to large districts like Houston, Dallas, and Katy to write their own independent rules to govern AI use.
Though it would be helpful for federal and state legislators to lead the charge on AI governance, education leaders cannot wait. In an environment where technology evolves every day, failing to take action is the worst position a school system can take. Even a district instituting a temporary moratorium or a device-level pause signals that education leaders care about this issue, even if they haven’t yet found the solution, and will continue to work until they come to a resolution that’s best for their students, families, and educators.
Likely with this in mind, four of the six largest districts in the country restricted or canceled student generative AI access within a matter of weeks, including New York City and Los Angeles, alongside Broward and Chicago. But in every case, the teachers kept their tools.
A moratorium or pause signals that education leaders are finally at the table, acknowledging the scale of the technology, and actively wrestling with its impact on young people.
Moving forward effectively will require a few actions:
Experimentation: Creating structured, sandbox environments where educators are free to test AI to develop lesson plans and build efficient systems to tackle administrative burdens.
Guidance: Publishing clear, actionable district-level policies so teachers, students, and parents aren't left guessing what constitutes responsible use.
Regulation: Codifying guardrails around which tools can be used and by whom, how student data is accessed, how it can be paired with lessons, and what students are expected to know.
While the responsibility to regulate AI use doesn’t fall solely on the school districts, they can be leaders within their states to develop clear rules of engagement, define liability, and build privacy frameworks so tools can be deployed inside public institutions safely and predictably. And if AI CEOs are asking for more regulation, education isn’t a bad place to start.
National Spotlight: How Miami-Dade is Building Youth AI Pathways
The nation’s third largest school district, Miami-Dade County Public Schools (M-DCPS), has partnered with higher education institutions, tech incubators, and workforce providers to build direct, AI-ready career pathways:
The Problem: Students need the right combination of technical skills, industry credentials, and wrap-around support to succeed in an AI-driven economy. Without state-level guidance, M-DCPS had to act.
The Intervention: M-DCPS partnered with Miami EdTech to launch state-approved AI pre-apprenticeships and launched the AI Institute to help educators build skills in AI. Miami Dade College (MDC) also connected its campus AI Centers with The Idea Center (MDC's startup hub). Students earn stackable AI credentials, build working prototypes in campus technical labs, and transition into incubator programs offering 1-on-1 mentorship from local founders and access to pitch capital.
The Takeaway: A combination of smart governance, clear district guidelines, and connected local education and workforce ecosystems show how education leaders can democratize AI access for public school students.
ICYMI
[INSIGHTS] SquareOne Insights: Curious where your state stands in the national regulatory landscape? We’ve published an interactive state-by-state breakdown on our website tracking K-12 AI guidance, legislative mandates, and district frameworks across all 50 states. Explore the data on our Insights page.
[REPORT] MultiState: 2026 Policy Brief including over 130 AI-related education bills introduced across 31 state legislatures this year, highlighting emerging trends in data privacy and curriculum integration.
[READ] Business Insider: A related take on how recent regulations might be driving tech into its “prohibition era."
Stay connected and explore our latest work at SquareOne.